FWRG.L vs. FLXK.L
FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) and FLXK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FWRG.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while FLXK.L tracks the Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FWRG.L returned 17.95%/yr vs 39.45%/yr for FLXK.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FWRG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLXK.L.
Performance
FWRG.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWRG.L achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 75.46% return.
FWRG.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXK.L
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -19.56%
- 6M
- 57.13%
- YTD
- 75.46%
- 1Y
- 141.50%
- 3Y*
- 39.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
FWRG.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc | 10.88% | 13.84% | 20.11% | 8,531.38% |
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 75.46% | 94.79% | -21.63% | 8.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWRG.L and FLXK.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FWRG.L and FLXK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWRG.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank
FWRG.L
FLXK.L
FWRG.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FWRG.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.47 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 5.86 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.26 | 18.40 | -6.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FWRG.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWRG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.87%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -49.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRG.L and FLXK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWRG.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.87% | -49.43% | +30.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -24.10% | +16.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.87% | -28.54% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -24.10% | +21.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -20.23% | +18.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 7.70% | -5.84% |
Volatility
FWRG.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) is 3.13%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 19.75%. This indicates that FWRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWRG.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 19.75% | -16.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | 41.53% | -33.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 45.08% | -34.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4,417.24% | 29.63% | +4,387.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4,417.24% | 29.61% | +4,387.63% |
FWRG.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWRG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FWRG.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FWRG.L nor FLXK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FWRG.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRG.L.
FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while FLXK.L tracks Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRG.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.
Find the right allocation for FWRG.L and FLXK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer