PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWOMX vs. FNSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWOMX vs. FNSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund (FWOMX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWOMX achieves a 15.91% return, which is significantly higher than FNSTX's 10.08% return.


FWOMX

1D
0.64%
1M
7.55%
YTD
15.91%
6M
13.58%
1Y
34.29%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*

FNSTX

1D
1.93%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
10.08%
6M
9.33%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWOMX vs. FNSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FWOMX
Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund
15.91%16.20%13.70%21.12%-19.82%19.42%25.30%6.11%
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
10.08%27.42%14.43%8.44%-7.59%7.58%12.80%5.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FWOMX and FNSTX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2019

0.72

The correlation between FWOMX and FNSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWOMX vs. FNSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWOMX
FWOMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FWOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FWOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSTX
FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWOMX vs. FNSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund (FWOMX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWOMXFNSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.32

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.25

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.06

11.01

+4.05

FWOMX vs. FNSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWOMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the FNSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWOMX and FNSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWOMXFNSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.77

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.71

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.62

+0.05

Drawdowns

FWOMX vs. FNSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWOMX drawdown since its inception was -36.47%, roughly equal to the maximum FNSTX drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWOMX and FNSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWOMXFNSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.47%

-35.82%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.74%

-8.43%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.53%

-13.63%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.05%

-21.97%

-8.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.84%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-5.17%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.49%

-0.15%

Volatility

FWOMX vs. FNSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund (FWOMX) is 3.87%, while Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that FWOMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWOMXFNSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

5.45%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

12.63%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

15.51%

-1.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.82%

15.15%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

18.77%

+1.81%

FWOMX vs. FNSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWOMX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSTX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWOMX vs. FNSTX - Dividend Comparison

FWOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than FNSTX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
3.80%4.16%1.59%1.85%1.35%0.63%0.80%0.36%
FWOMX
Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund
2.75%3.19%1.89%0.57%0.62%2.65%0.21%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FWOMX and FNSTX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNSTX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FWOMX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWOMX dropped -36.47% vs FNSTX's -35.82%.

FWOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWOMX and FNSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer