PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWOMX vs. FITLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FWOMX vs. FITLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund (FWOMX) and Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FWOMX vs. FITLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FWOMX
Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund
-7.51%16.20%13.70%21.12%-19.82%19.42%25.30%11.06%
FITLX
Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund
-8.73%18.77%23.59%29.04%-20.28%31.55%18.69%14.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWOMX achieves a -7.51% return, which is significantly higher than FITLX's -8.73% return.


FWOMX

1D
-0.84%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
-7.51%
6M
-4.91%
1Y
15.14%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*

FITLX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-8.43%
YTD
-8.73%
6M
-5.26%
1Y
16.00%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FWOMX vs. FITLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWOMX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FITLX's 0.11% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FWOMX vs. FITLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWOMX
FWOMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FWOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FWOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FITLX
FITLX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FITLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FITLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWOMX vs. FITLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund (FWOMX) and Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWOMXFITLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.90

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.23

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.26

5.04

-0.78

FWOMX vs. FITLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWOMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the FITLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWOMX and FITLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWOMXFITLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.90

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.64

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.71

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between FWOMX and FITLX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FWOMX vs. FITLX - Dividend Comparison

FWOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than FITLX's 1.22% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWOMX
Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund
3.45%3.19%1.89%0.57%0.62%2.65%0.21%0.27%0.00%0.00%
FITLX
Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund
1.22%1.11%1.29%1.12%1.49%0.99%1.01%1.41%1.58%0.76%

Drawdowns

FWOMX vs. FITLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWOMX drawdown since its inception was -36.47%, which is greater than FITLX's maximum drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWOMX and FITLX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FWOMXFITLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.47%

-34.35%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-11.38%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.05%

-26.91%

-3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.74%

-11.15%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-5.14%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.78%

+0.20%

Volatility

FWOMX vs. FITLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Women's Leadership Fund (FWOMX) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) at 4.45%. This indicates that FWOMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FITLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FWOMXFITLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

4.45%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

9.61%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.67%

18.29%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

17.50%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.67%

19.17%

+1.50%