PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWOCX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWOCX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class C (FWOCX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWOCX achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 24.97% return.


FWOCX

1D
2.08%
1M
-1.33%
6M
10.42%
YTD
12.16%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
15.07%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.03%

YFSIX

1D
3.06%
1M
4.28%
6M
14.11%
YTD
24.97%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FWOCX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FWOCX
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class C
12.16%17.93%10.94%19.97%-20.64%18.34%23.99%10.46%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
24.97%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FWOCX and YFSIX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019

0.70

The correlation between FWOCX and YFSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWOCX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FWOCX
FWOCX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FWOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FWOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FWOCX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class C (FWOCX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FWOCXYFSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.41

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

4.10

+6.01

FWOCX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWOCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWOCX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FWOCX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWOCX drawdown since its inception was -36.57%, roughly equal to the maximum YFSIX drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWOCX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWOCXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.57%

-35.10%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-14.20%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-14.20%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.65%

-25.14%

-5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-2.55%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-4.89%

-2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

4.86%

-2.57%

Volatility

FWOCX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class C (FWOCX) is 3.83%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that FWOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWOCXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

5.69%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

15.90%

-4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

22.66%

-8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

15.78%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

16.36%

+4.12%

FWOCX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWOCX has a 1.84% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWOCX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

FWOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWOCX
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class C
4.76%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FWOCX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to FWOCX (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWOCX dropped -36.57% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

FWOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWOCX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer