FWMNX vs. NWAUX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FWMNX (Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I) and NWAUX (Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FWMNX returned 10.04%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for NWAUX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FWMNX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NWAUX.

Performance

FWMNX vs. NWAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I (FWMNX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWMNX achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than NWAUX's 7.43% return.

FWMNX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 7.56%
• YTD: 15.92%
• 6M: 16.39%
• 1Y: 37.61%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: —

NWAUX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 7.43%
• 6M: 8.06%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: 13.35%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWMNX vs. NWAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FWMNX Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I	15.92%	19.13%	11.74%	21.18%	-19.76%	14.15%
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund	7.43%	-4.92%	27.90%	18.30%	-3.23%	22.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FWMNX and NWAUX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021	0.63

The correlation between FWMNX and NWAUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FWMNX vs. NWAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWMNX

FWMNX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FWMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FWMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FWMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FWMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FWMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

NWAUX

NWAUX Risk / Return Rank: 6
NWAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
NWAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NWAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
NWAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
NWAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWMNX vs. NWAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I (FWMNX) and Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWMNX	NWAUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	0.52	+2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	0.82	+3.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.09	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	0.78	+2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.44	1.73	+16.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWMNX vs. NWAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the NWAUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWMNX and NWAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWMNX	NWAUX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	0.52	+2.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.66	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.78	-0.10

Drawdowns

FWMNX vs. NWAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWMNX drawdown since its inception was -36.47%, which is greater than NWAUX's maximum drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWMNX and NWAUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWMNX	NWAUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.47%	-21.07%	-15.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.30%	-6.70%	-3.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.88%	-19.31%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.96%	-21.07%	-8.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.95%	+8.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.44%	-6.93%	-0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	3.02%	-0.93%

Volatility

FWMNX vs. NWAUX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I (FWMNX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund (NWAUX) at 3.47%. This indicates that FWMNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWMNX	NWAUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.88%	3.47%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.44%	7.67%	+2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	10.04%	+3.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.79%	16.09%	+1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.53%	15.93%	+4.60%

FWMNX vs. NWAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWMNX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than NWAUX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

FWMNX vs. NWAUX - Dividend Comparison

FWMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than NWAUX's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FWMNX Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Fund Class I	4.94%	5.73%	0.08%	0.66%	0.70%	2.78%	0.26%	0.27%
NWAUX Nationwide GQG US Quality Equity Fund	4.79%	4.35%	13.58%	0.40%	1.93%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWMNX and NWAUX in my portfolio?

FWMNX and NWAUX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FWMNX or NWAUX?

FWMNX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to NWAUX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWMNX dropped -36.47% vs NWAUX's -21.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.