FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FWEA.DE (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) and ETLQ.DE (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FWEA.DE tracks the FTSE All-World Index while ETLQ.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FWEA.DE returned 25.98% vs 23.85% for ETLQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE.

Performance

FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FWEA.DE having a 10.64% return and ETLQ.DE slightly higher at 10.88%.

FWEA.DE

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 2.84%
• YTD: 10.64%
• 6M: 11.58%
• 1Y: 25.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETLQ.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.89%
• YTD: 10.88%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 23.85%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FWEA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF	10.64%	17.53%	19.21%	8.62%
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	10.88%	8.14%	26.10%	8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FWEA.DE and ETLQ.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023	0.84

The correlation between FWEA.DE and ETLQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWEA.DE

FWEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 72
FWEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FWEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FWEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FWEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FWEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ETLQ.DE

ETLQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
ETLQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ETLQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ETLQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ETLQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ETLQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FWEA.DE	ETLQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.13	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	2.98	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.39	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	3.56	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.52	14.23	-0.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the ETLQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWEA.DE and ETLQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FWEA.DE	ETLQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.13	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	0.93	+0.58

Drawdowns

FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.48%, smaller than the maximum ETLQ.DE drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWEA.DE and ETLQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FWEA.DE	ETLQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.48%	-33.38%	+15.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.28%	-6.68%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-0.34%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.86%	-4.33%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.68%	+0.27%

Volatility

FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that FWEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FWEA.DE	ETLQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	2.68%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.93%	7.77%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.45%	11.18%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.72%	14.06%	-1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.72%	15.74%	-3.02%

FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FWEA.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWEA.DE nor ETLQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FWEA.DE and ETLQ.DE in my portfolio?

FWEA.DE and ETLQ.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FWEA.DE or ETLQ.DE?

On fees, ETLQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FWEA.DE or ETLQ.DE?

ETLQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FWEA.DE.

What is the main difference between FWEA.DE and ETLQ.DE?

FWEA.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index, while ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FWEA.DE and 0.10% for ETLQ.DE.