FWEA.DE vs. BTIC.DE
FWEA.DE (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) and BTIC.DE (Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - FWEA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while BTIC.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by Invesco. Over the past year, FWEA.DE returned 25.98% vs -41.55% for BTIC.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FWEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BTIC.DE.
Performance
FWEA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FWEA.DE is traded in EUR, while BTIC.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BTIC.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWEA.DE achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than BTIC.DE's -25.63% return.
FWEA.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTIC.DE
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- -20.62%
- YTD
- -25.63%
- 6M
- -30.74%
- 1Y
- -41.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWEA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FWEA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 10.64% | 17.53% | 19.21% | 8.62% |
BTIC.DE Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP | -25.62% | -26.09% | 143.52% | 36.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWEA.DE and BTIC.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWEA.DE vs. BTIC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FWEA.DE
BTIC.DE
FWEA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) and Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWEA.DE | BTIC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.83 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | -0.83 | +4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | -1.47 | +15.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWEA.DE | BTIC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | -1.02 | +3.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 0.03 | +1.48 |
Drawdowns
FWEA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.48%, smaller than the maximum BTIC.DE drawdown of -68.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWEA.DE and BTIC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWEA.DE | BTIC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.48% | -68.94% | +51.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -49.68% | +41.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -53.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -52.21% | +51.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -31.90% | +30.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 28.15% | -26.20% |
Volatility
FWEA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) is 3.36%, while Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that FWEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTIC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWEA.DE | BTIC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 10.17% | -6.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.93% | 31.94% | -23.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.45% | 40.61% | -29.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 50.56% | -37.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 50.56% | -37.84% |
FWEA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BTIC.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FWEA.DE vs. BTIC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FWEA.DE nor BTIC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FWEA.DE and BTIC.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTIC.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTIC.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FWEA.DE.
FWEA.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while BTIC.DE is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FWEA.DE and 0.10% for BTIC.DE.
Find the right allocation for FWEA.DE and BTIC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer