FWD vs. HYFI
FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) and HYFI (AB High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FWD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while HYFI is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FWD returned 38.93%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for HYFI. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FWD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYFI.
Performance
FWD vs. HYFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWD achieves a 38.47% return, which is significantly higher than HYFI's 1.98% return.
FWD
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 10.81%
- YTD
- 38.47%
- 6M
- 37.27%
- 1Y
- 72.96%
- 3Y*
- 38.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYFI
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWD vs. HYFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 38.47% | 32.00% | 29.23% | 22.89% |
HYFI AB High Yield ETF | 1.98% | 8.91% | 7.98% | 8.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWD and HYFI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2023 | 0.54 |
The correlation between FWD and HYFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
FWD vs. HYFI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FWD
HYFI
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
FWD
HYFI
-
Industrials
FWD
HYFI
-
Healthcare
FWD
HYFI
-
Communication Services
FWD
HYFI
Energy
FWD
HYFI
Consumer Cyclical
FWD
HYFI
Basic Materials
FWD
HYFI
-
Utilities
FWD
HYFI
-
Consumer Defensive
FWD
HYFI
-
Real Estate
FWD
HYFI
-
Financial Services
FWD
HYFI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWD vs. HYFI — Risk / Return Rank
FWD
HYFI
FWD vs. HYFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWD | HYFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.63 | 3.08 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.01 | 13.91 | +6.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWD | HYFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | 1.95 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.65 | 1.70 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
FWD vs. HYFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWD drawdown since its inception was -29.02%, which is greater than HYFI's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWD and HYFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWD | HYFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.02% | -6.34% | -22.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -2.49% | -10.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.02% | -6.34% | -22.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -0.21% | -1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -0.51% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 0.55% | +3.11% |
Volatility
FWD vs. HYFI - Volatility Comparison
AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) at 1.08%. This indicates that FWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWD | HYFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 1.08% | +6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.00% | 3.10% | +15.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.18% | 3.94% | +20.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 5.36% | +19.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 5.36% | +19.36% |
FWD vs. HYFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HYFI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FWD vs. HYFI - Dividend Comparison
FWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than HYFI's 6.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 0.08% | 0.11% | 1.89% | 0.00% |
HYFI AB High Yield ETF | 6.64% | 6.66% | 6.57% | 4.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FWD and HYFI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FWD has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to HYFI (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FWD dropped -29.02% vs HYFI's -6.34%.
On 3-year performance, FWD leads with 38.93% vs 9.21% for HYFI. On fees, HYFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FWD has performed better with a 38.93% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.
HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.
FWD is categorized as Global Equities, while HYFI is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FWD and 0.40% for HYFI.
FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FWD and HYFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer