PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWD vs. FYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FWD vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FWD vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
3.97%32.00%29.23%25.66%
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
15.22%34.53%3.00%11.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWD achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 15.22% return.


FWD

1D
5.03%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
3.97%
6M
7.40%
1Y
54.36%
3Y*
28.49%
5Y*
10Y*

FYLD

1D
2.23%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
15.22%
6M
21.63%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FWD vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FWD vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWD
FWD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWD vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWDFYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

2.76

-0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

3.43

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.60

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

3.33

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.30

19.47

-6.17

FWD vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWD Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the FYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWD and FYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWDFYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.76

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.44

+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between FWD and FYLD is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FWD vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

FWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FYLD's 3.75% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
0.11%0.11%1.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.75%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%

Drawdowns

FWD vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWD drawdown since its inception was -29.02%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWD and FYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FWDFYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.02%

-44.55%

+15.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.50%

-13.37%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.65%

-1.69%

-6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-8.94%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

2.29%

+1.71%

Volatility

FWD vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison

AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 5.30%. This indicates that FWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FWDFYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.26%

5.30%

+5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.48%

9.11%

+10.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.86%

16.41%

+12.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.63%

16.31%

+8.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.63%

18.09%

+6.54%