FVWSX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FVWSX (Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FVWSX returned 17.75%/yr vs 21.88%/yr for FBGRX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FVWSX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FVWSX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund (FVWSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVWSX achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FVWSX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 17.75%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.88% annualized return.

FVWSX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 3.87%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 26.73%
• 3Y*: 28.31%
• 5Y*: 15.55%
• 10Y*: 17.75%

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 9.10%
• YTD: 18.56%
• 6M: 19.76%
• 1Y: 44.98%
• 3Y*: 32.54%
• 5Y*: 17.08%
• 10Y*: 21.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVWSX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FVWSX Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund	9.61%	22.69%	36.47%	33.21%	-25.74%	24.95%	31.17%	30.57%	-2.07%	33.19%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	18.56%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FVWSX and FBGRX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2012	0.95

The correlation between FVWSX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FVWSX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVWSX

FVWSX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FVWSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
FVWSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FVWSX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FVWSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
FVWSX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVWSX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund (FVWSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FVWSX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.67	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.41	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.45	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	3.67	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.49	15.56	-4.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FVWSX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVWSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVWSX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FVWSX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.67	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.69	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92	0.93	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.68	+0.26

Drawdowns

FVWSX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVWSX drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVWSX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVWSX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.69%	-58.64%	+26.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.52%	-12.65%	+2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.23%	-27.07%	+6.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.69%	-43.08%	+11.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.69%	-43.08%	+11.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	0.00%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.28%	-12.53%	+7.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	2.98%	-0.61%

Volatility

FVWSX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund (FVWSX) is 3.72%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that FVWSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVWSX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	4.14%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	13.00%	-2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.21%	17.44%	-3.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	24.88%	-6.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.39%	23.69%	-4.30%

FVWSX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVWSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FVWSX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FVWSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.90%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FVWSX Fidelity Series Opportunistic Insights Fund	14.90%	16.24%	6.57%	1.02%	8.29%	21.40%	16.45%	9.19%	12.34%	12.74%	2.63%	7.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVWSX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FVWSX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FVWSX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to FVWSX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVWSX dropped -31.69% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.