FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L
FVUB.L (Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF) and IBZL.L (iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Latin America Equities funds tracking the MSCI Brazil NR USD, from Franklin Templeton and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FVUB.L returned 7.06%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for IBZL.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FVUB.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBZL.L.
Performance
FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FVUB.L is traded in GBP, while IBZL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IBZL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVUB.L achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than IBZL.L's 10.16% return.
FVUB.L
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -9.72%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- —
IBZL.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -12.01%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 36.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVUB.L Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF | 14.58% | 35.51% | -26.77% | 26.33% | 23.83% | -15.44% | -22.19% | -14.94% |
IBZL.L iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) | 10.16% | 38.28% | -26.04% | 25.61% | 32.04% | -19.06% | -16.73% | 7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVUB.L and IBZL.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FVUB.L and IBZL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Energy
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Basic Materials
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Utilities
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Industrials
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Consumer Defensive
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Healthcare
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Consumer Cyclical
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Communication Services
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Real Estate
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
-
Technology
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L — Risk / Return Rank
FVUB.L
IBZL.L
FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) and iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FVUB.L | IBZL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.17 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.35 | 7.39 | +0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FVUB.L | IBZL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.69 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.32 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.21 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVUB.L drawdown since its inception was -58.22%, smaller than the maximum IBZL.L drawdown of -69.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVUB.L and IBZL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVUB.L | IBZL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.22% | -69.44% | +11.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.83% | -16.58% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.50% | -27.68% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.42% | -28.21% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.83% | -16.43% | +2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.79% | -21.85% | -5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 4.87% | -0.49% |
Volatility
FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBZL.L) at 5.42%. This indicates that FVUB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBZL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVUB.L | IBZL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 5.42% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.17% | 17.53% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.79% | 21.29% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 26.40% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.39% | 31.47% | -0.08% |
FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVUB.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IBZL.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVUB.L vs. IBZL.L - Dividend Comparison
FVUB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBZL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVUB.L Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBZL.L iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) | 5.82% | 5.74% | 8.31% | 6.83% | 16.49% | 8.64% | 2.44% | 3.28% | 3.31% | 1.86% | 2.24% | 5.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FVUB.L and IBZL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FVUB.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FVUB.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBZL.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Brazil NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FVUB.L and 0.74% for IBZL.L.
Find the right allocation for FVUB.L and IBZL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer