FVSJ.DE vs. H410.DE
FVSJ.DE (Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF) and H410.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FVSJ.DE tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China while H410.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FVSJ.DE returned 14.63%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for H410.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVSJ.DE charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for H410.DE.
Performance
FVSJ.DE vs. H410.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVSJ.DE achieves a 45.45% return, which is significantly higher than H410.DE's 27.49% return.
FVSJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 45.45%
- 6M
- 49.69%
- 1Y
- 73.97%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- —
H410.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 6.19%
- YTD
- 27.49%
- 6M
- 29.22%
- 1Y
- 50.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
FVSJ.DE vs. H410.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVSJ.DE Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 45.45% | 15.41% | 14.01% | 8.23% | -7.58% | 13.71% | -3.67% | 13.83% | -5.82% |
H410.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 27.49% | 18.61% | 13.89% | 4.66% | -13.80% | 3.98% | 7.04% | 21.02% | -6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVSJ.DE and H410.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FVSJ.DE and H410.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVSJ.DE vs. H410.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FVSJ.DE
H410.DE
FVSJ.DE vs. H410.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FVSJ.DE | H410.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.51 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.17 | 4.75 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.31 | 17.19 | +6.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FVSJ.DE | H410.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60 | 2.82 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.49 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.41 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
FVSJ.DE vs. H410.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVSJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.95%, smaller than the maximum H410.DE drawdown of -36.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVSJ.DE and H410.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVSJ.DE | H410.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.95% | -36.25% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.93% | -10.48% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.76% | -18.96% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -23.76% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -2.80% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -10.25% | +5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.90% | +0.26% |
Volatility
FVSJ.DE vs. H410.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF (FVSJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) at 7.30%. This indicates that FVSJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H410.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVSJ.DE | H410.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 7.30% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.69% | 14.96% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 17.70% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 16.64% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 18.17% | -1.01% |
FVSJ.DE vs. H410.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVSJ.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than H410.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FVSJ.DE vs. H410.DE - Dividend Comparison
FVSJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H410.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVSJ.DE Franklin FTSE Asia ex China ex Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
H410.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 1.60% | 2.00% | 2.40% | 2.58% | 3.11% | 2.00% | 1.69% | 2.03% | 2.20% | 1.62% | 1.71% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FVSJ.DE and H410.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FVSJ.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FVSJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for H410.DE.
FVSJ.DE tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China, while H410.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for FVSJ.DE and 0.15% for H410.DE.
Find the right allocation for FVSJ.DE and H410.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer