PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVLSX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVLSX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FVLSX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVLSX achieves a 9.40% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 15.53% return.


FVLSX

1D
0.54%
1M
3.68%
YTD
9.40%
6M
10.20%
1Y
21.73%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.76%
YTD
15.53%
6M
18.30%
1Y
33.42%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVLSX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund
9.40%17.28%13.93%15.85%-17.05%11.73%15.50%22.36%-6.53%8.85%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
15.53%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FVLSX and FTIHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.90

The correlation between FVLSX and FTIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVLSX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVLSX
FVLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FVLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FVLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVLSX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FVLSX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVLSXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.43

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

2.93

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

11.54

+2.71

FVLSX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVLSX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVLSXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.31

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.63

+0.18

Drawdowns

FVLSX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVLSX drawdown since its inception was -24.68%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVLSX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVLSXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.68%

-35.75%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.71%

-11.25%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.02%

-13.15%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-29.99%

+5.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-7.22%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

2.85%

-1.30%

Volatility

FVLSX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FVLSX) is 3.10%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that FVLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVLSXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

4.76%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

12.02%

-4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.66%

14.30%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.92%

15.27%

-4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.79%

16.05%

-4.26%

FVLSX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FVLSX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FVLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, more than FTIHX's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.41%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%
FVLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2030 Fund
9.72%6.71%8.31%2.52%4.48%6.07%5.28%6.80%7.38%2.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FVLSX and FTIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FVLSX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVLSX dropped -24.68% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FVLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVLSX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer