PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVLKX vs. FIDFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVLKX vs. FIDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Fund Class K (FVLKX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVLKX achieves a 25.23% return, which is significantly lower than FIDFX's 26.51% return.


FVLKX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.06%
6M
18.14%
YTD
25.23%
1Y
40.09%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
13.10%
ALL TIME*
10.19%

FIDFX

1D
0.34%
1M
1.52%
6M
19.63%
YTD
26.51%
1Y
41.93%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
14.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FVLKX vs. FIDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVLKX
Fidelity Value Fund Class K
25.23%11.37%14.64%19.65%-8.91%35.38%9.41%31.92%-17.56%11.12%
FIDFX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z
26.51%13.16%14.66%22.69%-10.52%34.11%1.15%23.72%-18.82%13.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FVLKX and FIDFX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FVLKX and FIDFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVLKX vs. FIDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FVLKX
FVLKX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FVLKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVLKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVLKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FVLKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVLKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FIDFX
FIDFX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FIDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FVLKX vs. FIDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Fund Class K (FVLKX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVLKXFIDFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.72

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

14.74

-0.67

FVLKX vs. FIDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVLKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FIDFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVLKX and FIDFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVLKX vs. FIDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVLKX drawdown since its inception was -62.82%, which is greater than FIDFX's maximum drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVLKX and FIDFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVLKXFIDFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.82%

-44.98%

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.86%

-10.31%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.39%

-23.70%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

-23.70%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.94%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-6.78%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

2.61%

+0.02%

Volatility

FVLKX vs. FIDFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Fund Class K (FVLKX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVLKXFIDFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.32%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

12.28%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

16.58%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

20.17%

+2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

21.55%

+1.80%

FVLKX vs. FIDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVLKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVLKX vs. FIDFX - Dividend Comparison

FVLKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than FIDFX's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDFX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z
6.25%8.32%10.60%1.30%13.40%1.43%2.11%2.03%15.16%9.15%0.00%0.00%
FVLKX
Fidelity Value Fund Class K
8.01%10.03%20.95%3.80%7.16%9.87%1.06%3.43%16.38%3.37%1.36%11.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FVLKX and FIDFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIDFX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FVLKX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVLKX dropped -62.82% vs FIDFX's -44.98%.

FIDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVLKX and FIDFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer