PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVITX vs. FBLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVITX vs. FBLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M (FVITX) and Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVITX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly higher than FBLTX's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FVITX has outperformed FBLTX with an annualized return of 0.48%, while FBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower -1.69% annualized return.


FVITX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
2.66%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
0.48%

FBLTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
-1.49%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
-1.75%
5Y*
-6.26%
10Y*
-1.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVITX vs. FBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVITX
Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M
0.20%6.23%-0.15%3.65%-13.28%-2.53%6.56%5.99%0.41%1.78%
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.23%4.39%-8.05%2.71%-31.84%-4.89%18.27%14.36%-1.24%9.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FVITX and FBLTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2015

0.91

The correlation between FVITX and FBLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVITX vs. FBLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVITX
FVITX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FVITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVITX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FVITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVITX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLTX
FBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVITX vs. FBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M (FVITX) and Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVITXFBLTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

0.41

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

0.66

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.08

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

0.72

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.47

1.83

+2.64

FVITX vs. FBLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the FBLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVITX and FBLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVITXFBLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.41

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

-0.40

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

-0.12

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

-0.05

+0.52

Drawdowns

FVITX vs. FBLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVITX drawdown since its inception was -20.63%, smaller than the maximum FBLTX drawdown of -49.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVITX and FBLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVITXFBLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-49.06%

+28.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-7.66%

+4.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.49%

-19.12%

+12.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

-44.19%

+25.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.63%

-49.06%

+28.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.42%

-41.10%

+32.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-20.98%

+17.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

3.00%

-2.00%

Volatility

FVITX vs. FBLTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M (FVITX) is 1.18%, while Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FBLTX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that FVITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVITXFBLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

2.82%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

6.57%

-3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

9.84%

-6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.11%

15.70%

-9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

14.60%

-9.56%

FVITX vs. FBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVITX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLTX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVITX vs. FBLTX - Dividend Comparison

FVITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than FBLTX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLTX
Fidelity SAI Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
4.17%4.04%3.60%3.29%2.25%1.81%6.73%2.39%2.87%2.68%3.70%0.39%
FVITX
Fidelity Advisor Government Income Fund Class M
3.17%3.07%2.95%2.04%0.89%0.40%2.07%1.81%1.76%1.48%2.34%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FVITX and FBLTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBLTX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to FVITX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVITX dropped -20.63% vs FBLTX's -49.06%.

FVITX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVITX and FBLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer