FVIFX vs. FCMVX
FVIFX (Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I) and FCMVX (Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FVIFX returned 11.72%/yr vs 25.96%/yr for FCMVX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FVIFX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FCMVX.
Performance
FVIFX vs. FCMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVIFX achieves a 22.52% return, which is significantly lower than FCMVX's 24.89% return.
FVIFX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 16.24%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 1Y
- 32.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
FCMVX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 18.64%
- YTD
- 24.89%
- 1Y
- 35.81%
- 3Y*
- 42.63%
- 5Y*
- 25.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FVIFX vs. FCMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVIFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I | 22.52% | 11.29% | 10.37% | 19.68% | -9.15% | 35.08% | 9.87% | 31.79% | -17.76% | 8.63% |
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund | 24.89% | 12.62% | 87.16% | 23.07% | -10.26% | 34.12% | 0.52% | 23.65% | -18.69% | 12.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVIFX and FCMVX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.97 |
The correlation between FVIFX and FCMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVIFX vs. FCMVX — Risk / Return Rank
FVIFX
FCMVX
FVIFX vs. FCMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I (FVIFX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVIFX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 3.44 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 13.24 | -1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVIFX vs. FCMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVIFX drawdown since its inception was -66.85%, which is greater than FCMVX's maximum drawdown of -44.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVIFX and FCMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVIFX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.85% | -44.63% | -22.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -10.21% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.33% | -38.56% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.33% | -38.56% | +14.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.32% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.60% | -9.25% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.65% | +0.05% |
Volatility
FVIFX vs. FCMVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I (FVIFX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund (FCMVX) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVIFX | FCMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 5.26% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.93% | 12.43% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.44% | 16.67% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 60.58% | -40.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 47.55% | -25.45% |
FVIFX vs. FCMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVIFX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FCMVX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVIFX vs. FCMVX - Dividend Comparison
FVIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than FCMVX's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value K6 Fund | 3.96% | 6.68% | 76.67% | 1.29% | 1.68% | 1.39% | 2.19% | 1.68% | 2.99% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FVIFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I | 6.82% | 8.36% | 12.68% | 1.05% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 0.68% | 3.33% | 15.05% | 3.49% | 0.91% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, FVIFX and FCMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FCMVX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to FVIFX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVIFX dropped -66.85% vs FCMVX's -44.63%.
FCMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVIFX and FCMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer