PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FVD.L vs. GINC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FVD.L vs. GINC.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

FVD.L (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and GINC.L (First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF) are both Dividend funds from First Trust - FVD.L tracks the First Trust Value Line Dividend Index UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation while GINC.L tracks the First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FVD.L returned 5.82%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for GINC.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FVD.L vs. GINC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Value Line Dividend Index UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FVD.L) and First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF (GINC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FVD.L is traded in USD, while GINC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GINC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVD.L achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than GINC.L's 13.48% return.

FVD.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.73%
6M
4.38%
YTD
6.31%
1Y
10.94%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
—

GINC.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.68%
6M
11.26%
YTD
13.48%
1Y
30.40%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVD.L vs. GINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FVD.L
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation		6.31%8.66%9.25%3.39%-4.80%24.66%-3.10%
GINC.L
First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF		13.48%40.15%4.79%16.46%-7.08%9.86%-1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FVD.L and GINC.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2020

0.61

The correlation between FVD.L and GINC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation

First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

FVD.L vs. GINC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FVD.L
FVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
GINC.L
GINC.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GINC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GINC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVD.L vs. GINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Value Line Dividend Index UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FVD.L) and First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF (GINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FVD.LGINC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.12
2.56

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.59
3.34

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

4.52

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

14.01

-10.00

FVD.L vs. GINC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the GINC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVD.L and GINC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVD.L vs. GINC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum GINC.L drawdown of -40.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVD.L and GINC.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FVD.LGINC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-40.05%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-6.71%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.60%

-13.64%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.22%

-26.74%

+10.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

0.00%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-8.08%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.17%

+0.69%

Volatility

FVD.L vs. GINC.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Value Line Dividend Index UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FVD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF (GINC.L) at 2.61%. This indicates that FVD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FVD.LGINC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

2.61%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

9.20%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.23%

11.84%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.79%

15.15%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

16.99%

-0.53%

Dividends

FVD.L vs. GINC.L - Dividend Comparison

FVD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVD.L
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GINC.L
First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF		3.38%3.67%4.33%5.62%5.35%3.84%3.47%3.95%3.66%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

FVD.L and GINC.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVD.L tracks First Trust Value Line Dividend Index UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation, while GINC.L tracks First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVD.L and GINC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer