PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVC vs. PFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVC vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVC achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly higher than PFIX's -10.86% return.


FVC

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.47%
YTD
14.86%
6M
13.30%
1Y
20.47%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
4.32%
10Y*
8.56%

PFIX

1D
-4.17%
1M
-14.73%
YTD
-10.86%
6M
-9.14%
1Y
-14.11%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVC vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FVC
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF
14.86%2.12%12.43%-4.59%-6.03%7.58%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
-10.86%0.42%35.94%5.67%92.05%-24.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FVC and PFIX is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021

-0.06

The correlation between FVC and PFIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVC vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVC
FVC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PFIX
PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVC vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVCPFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.94

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

-0.55

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

-0.84

+6.84

FVC vs. PFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVC Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the PFIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVC and PFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVC vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVC and PFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVCPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-36.17%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-25.64%

+12.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-36.17%

+21.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.62%

-36.17%

+13.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-26.51%

+24.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-17.16%

+10.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

16.76%

-13.34%

Volatility

FVC vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) is 6.76%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that FVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVCPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

7.76%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

21.72%

-8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.35%

29.43%

-15.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

38.51%

-22.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

38.26%

-20.58%

FVC vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than PFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVC vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison

FVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than PFIX's 10.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FVC
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF
1.96%2.57%0.78%1.89%1.50%0.09%0.21%1.07%0.24%0.63%0.67%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
10.89%9.92%3.40%87.92%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVC and PFIX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIX has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to FVC (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVC dropped -30.96% vs PFIX's -36.17%.

On 5-year performance, PFIX leads with 16.44% vs 4.32% for FVC. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FVC has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 16.44% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FVC.

PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 10.89%, compared with 1.96% for FVC.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FVC and 0.50% for PFIX.

FVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVC and PFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer