PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVC vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVC vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVC achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FVC has outperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 8.62%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.


FVC

1D
1.40%
1M
11.30%
YTD
17.30%
6M
17.97%
1Y
23.41%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
8.62%

NFTY

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
-9.70%
6M
-7.99%
1Y
-8.48%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
4.62%
10Y*
8.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVC vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVC
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF
17.30%2.12%12.43%-4.59%-6.03%21.92%12.71%19.28%-8.60%19.74%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-9.70%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FVC and NFTY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2016

0.34

FVC vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FVC
NFTY

Technology

29.0%
9.2%

Industrials

27.8%
8.3%

Financial Services

19.8%
21.2%

Healthcare

19.4%
9.7%

Energy

17.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
16.3%

Communication Services

6.3%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

12.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.3%

Utilities

-

4.0%

Technology

FVC
29.0%
NFTY
9.2%

Industrials

FVC
27.8%
NFTY
8.3%

Financial Services

FVC
19.8%
NFTY
21.2%

Healthcare

FVC
19.4%
NFTY
9.7%

Energy

FVC
17.5%
NFTY
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FVC
6.4%
NFTY
16.3%

Communication Services

FVC
6.3%
NFTY
2.0%

Real Estate

FVC
0.7%
NFTY

-

Basic Materials

FVC

-

NFTY
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

FVC

-

NFTY
8.3%

Utilities

FVC

-

NFTY
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVC vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVC
FVC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVC Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVC vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVCNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.91

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

-0.53

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

-1.39

+8.33

FVC vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVC Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVC and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVCNFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

-0.58

+2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.27

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.39

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.28

+0.22

Drawdowns

FVC vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVC and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVCNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-47.67%

+16.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-16.14%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-21.55%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.62%

-21.55%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

-47.67%

+16.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.45%

+17.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-9.58%

+2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

6.12%

-2.74%

Volatility

FVC vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) is 4.29%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that FVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVCNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

4.58%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

12.57%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

14.72%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

17.39%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

20.72%

-3.11%

FVC vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVC vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than NFTY's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVC
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF
1.92%2.57%0.78%1.89%1.50%0.09%0.21%1.07%0.24%0.63%0.67%0.00%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.96%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVC and NFTY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFTY has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to FVC (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVC dropped -30.96% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, FVC leads with 8.62% vs 8.13% for NFTY. On fees, FVC is cheaper at 0.71% per year. On volatility, FVC has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FVC has performed better with a 8.62% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FVC is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.92% for FVC.

FVC is categorized as Hedge Fund, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. FVC tracks Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FVC and 0.80% for NFTY.

FVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVC and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer