FVC vs. MMKT

Last updated Jul 9, 2026

FVC (First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF) and MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVC is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index, while MMKT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Texas Capital. FVC is passively managed, while MMKT is actively managed. Over the past year, FVC returned 18.46% vs 3.79% for MMKT. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. FVC charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MMKT.

Performance

FVC vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVC achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.78% return.

FVC

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -0.73%
• 6M: 10.20%
• YTD: 14.15%
• 1Y: 18.46%
• 3Y*: 9.13%
• 5Y*: 4.21%
• 10Y*: 8.08%

MMKT

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.71%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVC vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF	14.15%	2.12%	2.53%
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	1.78%	4.13%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FVC and MMKT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	-0.05

The correlation between FVC and MMKT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FVC vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVC

FVC Risk / Return Rank: 39
FVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FVC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FVC Martin Ratio Rank: 40

MMKT

MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVC vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FVC	MMKT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	17.06	-15.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	63.49	-61.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	16.24	-15.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	152.50	-151.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.32	919.85	-914.53

FVC vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVC Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 17.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVC and MMKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FVC vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVC and MMKT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVC	MMKT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-0.04%	-30.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.32%	-0.02%	-13.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.21%	0.00%	-5.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-0.00%	-7.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	0.00%	+3.48%

Volatility

FVC vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.04%. This indicates that FVC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVC	MMKT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.49%	0.04%	+7.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.54%	0.13%	+14.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.36%	0.22%	+15.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.66%	0.23%	+16.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.72%	0.23%	+17.49%

FVC vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FVC vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

FVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than MMKT's 3.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF	1.32%	2.57%	0.78%	1.89%	1.50%	0.09%	0.21%	1.07%	0.24%	0.63%	0.67%
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	3.70%	3.98%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVC and MMKT in my portfolio?

FVC and MMKT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FVC or MMKT?

FVC has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to MMKT (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVC dropped -30.96% vs MMKT's -0.04%.

Which ETF is better, FVC or MMKT?

On 1-year performance, FVC leads with 18.46% vs 3.79% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FVC or MMKT?

Over the 1-year period, FVC has performed better with a 18.46% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FVC or MMKT?

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FVC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FVC or MMKT?

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 1.32% for FVC.

What is the main difference between FVC and MMKT?

FVC is categorized as Hedge Fund, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FVC and 0.20% for MMKT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.06 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.