FUTY vs. BKGI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while BKGI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. FUTY is passively managed, while BKGI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FUTY returned 13.73%/yr vs 22.42%/yr for BKGI. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FUTY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.

Performance

FUTY vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than BKGI's 13.10% return.

FUTY

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -4.86%
• YTD: 3.78%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: 12.10%
• 3Y*: 13.73%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: 9.10%

BKGI

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 13.10%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 23.46%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTY vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF	3.78%	16.40%	23.20%	-7.46%	6.31%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	13.10%	37.53%	12.35%	9.72%	8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTY and BKGI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2022	0.67

The correlation between FUTY and BKGI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

FUTY vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FUTY	BKGI
Utilities	99.2%	49.3%
Energy	0.5%	21.6%
Industrials	0.2%	14.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	3.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	11.5%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

FUTY vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTY

FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 25
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 24

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 66
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTY vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FUTY	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	2.03	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	2.82	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.37	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	3.83	-2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.05	12.53	-9.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FUTY vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTY and BKGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FUTY	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	2.03	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	1.63	-1.07

Drawdowns

FUTY vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and BKGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUTY	BKGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.44%	-14.79%	-21.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-6.16%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.35%	-14.16%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.72%	-2.37%	-4.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-2.57%	-3.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	1.88%	+2.10%

Volatility

FUTY vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 4.19%. This indicates that FUTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUTY	BKGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	4.19%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	9.07%	+2.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.34%	11.60%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.08%	14.07%	+3.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	14.07%	+4.98%

FUTY vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FUTY vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than BKGI's 2.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.67%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF	2.60%	2.67%	2.96%	3.31%	2.72%	2.70%	3.07%	2.82%	3.11%	3.03%	3.35%	4.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUTY and BKGI in my portfolio?

FUTY and BKGI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FUTY or BKGI?

FUTY has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to BKGI (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTY dropped -36.44% vs BKGI's -14.79%.

Which ETF is better, FUTY or BKGI?

On 3-year performance, BKGI leads with 22.42% vs 13.73% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, BKGI has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FUTY or BKGI?

Over the 3-year period, BKGI has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FUTY or BKGI?

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FUTY or BKGI?

BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.60% for FUTY.

What is the main difference between FUTY and BKGI?

FUTY is categorized as Utilities Equities, while BKGI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FUTY and 0.65% for BKGI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKGI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.