PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTU vs. IBKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUTU vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTU achieves a -39.65% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 41.50% return.


FUTU

1D
2.10%
1M
-31.67%
YTD
-39.65%
6M
-42.20%
1Y
-13.16%
3Y*
34.68%
5Y*
-6.95%
10Y*

IBKR

1D
2.23%
1M
6.79%
YTD
41.50%
6M
41.85%
1Y
78.02%
3Y*
67.33%
5Y*
41.64%
10Y*
26.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTU vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
-39.65%105.29%49.87%34.39%-6.12%-5.36%343.31%-30.08%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
41.50%46.37%114.43%15.14%-8.35%31.12%31.71%-12.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTU and IBKR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.31

The correlation between FUTU and IBKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUTU:

$13.82B

IBKR:

$40.72B

EPS

FUTU:

HK$71.05

IBKR:

$3.76

PE Ratio

FUTU:

10.76

IBKR:

24.18

PEG Ratio

FUTU:

0.22

IBKR:

0.83

PS Ratio

FUTU:

4.50

IBKR:

4.66

PB Ratio

FUTU:

2.63

IBKR:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUTU:

HK$24.01B

IBKR:

$8.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUTU:

HK$21.07B

IBKR:

$7.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

FUTU:

HK$14.81B

IBKR:

$7.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTU vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTU
FUTU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FUTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTU vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUTUIBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.33

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

4.20

-4.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.64

10.65

-11.29

FUTU vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTU and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUTU vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTU drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -63.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTU and IBKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTUIBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.23%

-63.66%

-23.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.18%

-18.70%

-35.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.18%

-38.66%

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.42%

-38.66%

-47.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.21%

0.00%

-50.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.53%

-24.85%

-22.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.61%

7.35%

+13.26%

Volatility

FUTU vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) has a higher volatility of 39.14% compared to Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) at 11.31%. This indicates that FUTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTUIBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.14%

11.31%

+27.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.00%

27.82%

+23.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.08%

37.67%

+25.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.75%

34.50%

+38.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.16%

33.37%

+41.79%

Dividends

FUTU vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

FUTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than IBKR's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
2.67%0.00%2.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.36%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%

Financials

FUTU vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Futu Holdings Limited and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.86B
765.00M
(FUTU) Total Revenue
(IBKR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FUTU values in HKD, IBKR values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


FUTU and IBKR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUTU has higher volatility (39.14%) compared to IBKR (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTU dropped -87.23% vs IBKR's -63.66%.

IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTU and IBKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer