FUTG vs. XTAP
FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FUTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
FUTG vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUTG achieves a -75.13% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 10.44% return.
FUTG
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -61.72%
- YTD
- -75.13%
- 6M
- -77.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- 20.47%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.13% | -0.20% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.44% | 2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTG and XTAP is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTG vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
FUTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTAP
FUTG vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUTG | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 11.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 63.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUTG vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTG drawdown since its inception was -86.19%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTG and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTG | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.19% | -22.13% | -64.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.04% | -0.68% | -83.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.98% | -3.44% | -38.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility
FUTG vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTG | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.43% | 4.86% | +128.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.43% | 14.54% | +118.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 133.43% | 14.38% | +119.05% |
FUTG vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUTG vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither FUTG nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUTG and XTAP have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTAP.
FUTG and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FUTG and 0.79% for XTAP.
Find the right allocation for FUTG and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer