PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTG vs. BAIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTG vs. BAIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BBAI Daily ETF (BAIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTG achieves a -75.13% return, which is significantly lower than BAIG's -63.74% return.


FUTG

1D
3.79%
1M
-61.72%
YTD
-75.13%
6M
-77.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAIG

1D
-5.76%
1M
-22.63%
YTD
-63.74%
6M
-75.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTG vs. BAIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FUTG and BAIG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTG vs. BAIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BBAI Daily ETF (BAIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FUTG vs. BAIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUTG vs. BAIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTG drawdown since its inception was -86.19%, smaller than the maximum BAIG drawdown of -92.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTG and BAIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTGBAIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.19%

-92.86%

+6.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.04%

-89.85%

+5.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.98%

-63.53%

+21.55%

Volatility

FUTG vs. BAIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTGBAIGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

133.43%

180.15%

-46.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

133.43%

180.15%

-46.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

133.43%

180.15%

-46.72%

FUTG vs. BAIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BAIG's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUTG vs. BAIG - Dividend Comparison

FUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.07%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FUTG and BAIG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for BAIG.

BAIG has the higher dividend yield at 15.07%, compared with 0.00% for FUTG.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FUTG and 0.78% for BAIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTG and BAIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer