FUTBX vs. FUAMX
FUTBX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund) and FUAMX (Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Government Bonds funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FUTBX returned -0.41%/yr vs -0.36%/yr for FUAMX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
FUTBX vs. FUAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUTBX achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than FUAMX's -0.27% return.
FUTBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FUAMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.20%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- —
FUTBX vs. FUAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTBX Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.07% | 6.12% | 0.70% | 4.19% | -13.00% | -2.54% | 7.76% | 7.30% | 0.95% | 0.05% |
FUAMX Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund | -0.27% | 8.00% | 0.40% | 4.08% | -13.06% | -3.19% | 8.86% | 7.25% | 1.25% | -0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTBX and FUAMX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FUTBX and FUAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTBX vs. FUAMX — Risk / Return Rank
FUTBX
FUAMX
FUTBX vs. FUAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUTBX | FUAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.95 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.44 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 1.11 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | 3.27 | +0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUTBX | FUAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.95 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | -0.05 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.22 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
FUTBX vs. FUAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTBX drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FUAMX drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTBX and FUAMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTBX | FUAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.69% | -20.25% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -3.72% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.42% | -6.07% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.03% | -18.27% | +1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.62% | -6.69% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -7.32% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 1.26% | -0.21% |
Volatility
FUTBX vs. FUAMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) is 1.20%, while Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that FUTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTBX | FUAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 1.44% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 3.09% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 4.34% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 6.63% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 5.85% | -0.70% |
FUTBX vs. FUAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FUTBX and FUAMX have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FUTBX vs. FUAMX - Dividend Comparison
FUTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than FUAMX's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUAMX Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.75% | 3.52% | 3.58% | 2.20% | 1.24% | 1.76% | 2.90% | 2.16% | 2.23% | 0.49% |
FUTBX Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.65% | 3.43% | 2.90% | 2.12% | 1.12% | 0.86% | 4.54% | 2.75% | 2.05% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FUTBX and FUAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FUAMX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to FUTBX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTBX dropped -19.69% vs FUAMX's -20.25%.
FUTBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUTBX and FUAMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer