FUTBX vs. FNBGX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FUTBX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund) and FNBGX (Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Government Bonds funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FUTBX returned -1.07%/yr vs -7.27%/yr for FNBGX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.

Performance

FUTBX vs. FNBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTBX achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly higher than FNBGX's -3.60% return.

FUTBX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: -0.85%
• YTD: -0.94%
• 1Y: 0.79%
• 3Y*: 3.00%
• 5Y*: -1.07%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.16%

FNBGX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -3.83%
• 6M: -3.19%
• YTD: -3.60%
• 1Y: -2.02%
• 3Y*: -0.74%
• 5Y*: -7.27%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FUTBX Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FUTBX vs. FNBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FUTBX Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund	-0.94%	6.12%	0.70%	4.19%	-13.00%	-2.54%	7.76%	7.30%	0.95%	0.15%
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund	-3.60%	5.30%	-6.18%	3.20%	-29.89%	-5.17%	17.58%	14.24%	-1.62%	1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTBX and FNBGX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017	0.94

The correlation between FUTBX and FNBGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FUTBX vs. FNBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FUTBX

FUTBX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FUTBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FUTBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FUTBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FUTBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FUTBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

FNBGX

FNBGX Risk / Return Rank: 3
FNBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FNBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FNBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FNBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FNBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FUTBX vs. FNBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FUTBX	FNBGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	-0.09	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	-0.06	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.99	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	-0.10	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.31	-0.23	+1.53

FUTBX vs. FNBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the FNBGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTBX and FNBGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FUTBX vs. FNBGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTBX drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum FNBGX drawdown of -46.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTBX and FNBGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUTBX	FNBGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.69%	-46.86%	+27.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-7.38%	+4.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.86%	-13.48%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.87%	-41.54%	+24.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.55%	-39.51%	+30.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.97%	-21.94%	+14.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	3.29%	-1.98%

Volatility

FUTBX vs. FNBGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUTBX) is 0.92%, while Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that FUTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUTBX	FNBGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	2.25%	-1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.88%	6.37%	-3.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.73%	8.46%	-4.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.79%	14.46%	-8.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.13%	14.11%	-8.98%

FUTBX vs. FNBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FUTBX and FNBGX have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FUTBX vs. FNBGX - Dividend Comparison

FUTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than FNBGX's 3.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund	3.82%	3.88%	3.75%	3.20%	2.26%	2.47%	3.96%	2.63%	2.93%	0.70%
FUTBX Fidelity SAI U.S. Treasury Bond Index Fund	3.50%	3.43%	2.90%	2.12%	1.12%	0.86%	4.54%	2.75%	2.05%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUTBX and FNBGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FUTBX and FNBGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FUTBX or FNBGX?

FNBGX has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to FUTBX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTBX dropped -19.69% vs FNBGX's -46.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FUTBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.