FUSS.L vs. BBSU.L
FUSS.L (Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc) and BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from Fidelity and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSS.L returned 14.92%/yr vs 14.50%/yr for BBSU.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FUSS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBSU.L.
Performance
FUSS.L vs. BBSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FUSS.L is traded in GBP, while BBSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BBSU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FUSS.L having a 10.18% return and BBSU.L slightly higher at 10.31%.
FUSS.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- 29.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- —
BBSU.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
FUSS.L vs. BBSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSS.L Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc | 10.18% | 9.84% | 28.34% | 22.30% | -11.83% | 28.45% | 13.81% |
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.31% | 9.39% | 27.19% | 20.71% | -10.46% | 29.25% | 13.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUSS.L and BBSU.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FUSS.L and BBSU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUSS.L vs. BBSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
FUSS.L
BBSU.L
FUSS.L vs. BBSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUSS.L | BBSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.50 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 3.65 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.87 | 12.74 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUSS.L | BBSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.70 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.96 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
FUSS.L vs. BBSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUSS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.18%, smaller than the maximum BBSU.L drawdown of -25.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSS.L and BBSU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUSS.L | BBSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.18% | -25.80% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.24% | -7.80% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.18% | -21.42% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.18% | -21.42% | -0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.17% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.62% | -3.72% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.24% | +0.08% |
Volatility
FUSS.L vs. BBSU.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Sustainable Research Enhanced US Equity UCITS ETF Acc (FUSS.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUSS.L | BBSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.64% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | 7.21% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 10.54% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 14.45% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 16.10% | -0.93% |
FUSS.L vs. BBSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUSS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUSS.L vs. BBSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FUSS.L nor BBSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FUSS.L and BBSU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FUSS.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FUSS.L and 0.05% for BBSU.L.
Find the right allocation for FUSS.L and BBSU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer