PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSI vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSI vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSI achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.13% return.


FUSI

1D
0.03%
1M
0.35%
6M
2.78%
YTD
2.99%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
1.92%
1M
18.08%
6M
14.43%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
120.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSI vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FUSI and WNTR is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSI vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSI
FUSI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FUSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSI vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUSIWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.75

1.34

+1.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.11

2.84

+9.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

88.51

7.31

+81.20

FUSI vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSI Sharpe Ratio is 5.64, which is higher than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSI and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUSI vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSI drawdown since its inception was -0.70%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSI and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSIWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-42.65%

+41.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.45%

-42.65%

+42.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.15%

+10.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-20.53%

+20.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

16.58%

-16.52%

Volatility

FUSI vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF (FUSI) is 0.22%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that FUSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSIWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

18.84%

-18.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.67%

47.46%

-46.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96%

53.83%

-52.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.09%

53.56%

-52.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.09%

53.56%

-52.47%

FUSI vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSI has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUSI vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

FUSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FUSI
American Century Multisector Floating Income ETF
5.23%5.28%5.98%4.97%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
102.14%58.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSI and WNTR have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to FUSI (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUSI dropped -0.70% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 5.37% for FUSI. On fees, FUSI is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, FUSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 5.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUSI is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 5.23% for FUSI.

FUSI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: American Century and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for FUSI and 1.01% for WNTR.

FUSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.64 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSI and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer