FUSD.L vs. TDIV
FUSD.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FUSD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSD.L returned 10.15%/yr vs 17.29%/yr for TDIV. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FUSD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
FUSD.L vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUSD.L achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 20.48% return.
FUSD.L
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 5.71%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 20.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- —
TDIV
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 20.48%
- 6M
- 16.19%
- 1Y
- 39.10%
- 3Y*
- 29.65%
- 5Y*
- 17.29%
- 10Y*
- 18.41%
FUSD.L vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 5.71% | 16.47% | 15.86% | 17.14% | -12.08% | 24.36% | 10.46% | 28.68% | -6.45% | 15.03% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 20.48% | 25.27% | 24.43% | 36.71% | -22.13% | 29.49% | 17.55% | 33.27% | -3.18% | 13.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUSD.L and TDIV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FUSD.L and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
FUSD.L vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FUSD.L
TDIV
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FUSD.L
TDIV
Financial Services
FUSD.L
TDIV
-
Communication Services
FUSD.L
TDIV
Consumer Cyclical
FUSD.L
TDIV
-
Healthcare
FUSD.L
TDIV
-
Industrials
FUSD.L
TDIV
Consumer Defensive
FUSD.L
TDIV
-
Energy
FUSD.L
TDIV
-
Utilities
FUSD.L
TDIV
-
Basic Materials
FUSD.L
TDIV
-
Real Estate
FUSD.L
TDIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUSD.L vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
FUSD.L
TDIV
FUSD.L vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUSD.L | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.66 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.20 | 10.96 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUSD.L | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 2.01 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.83 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
FUSD.L vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSD.L and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUSD.L | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.98% | -31.97% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.94% | -10.74% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -23.00% | +5.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.25% | -31.97% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -9.39% | +7.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -4.84% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.58% | -1.76% |
Volatility
FUSD.L vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) is 2.96%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 9.74%. This indicates that FUSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUSD.L | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 9.74% | -6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.84% | 15.37% | -7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 19.53% | -9.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 20.86% | -6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 20.95% | -5.15% |
FUSD.L vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUSD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUSD.L vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
FUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than TDIV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSD.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc | 1.45% | 1.47% | 0.47% | 1.04% | 0.56% | 0.94% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUSD.L and TDIV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUSD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUSD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.
FUSD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSD.L and 0.50% for TDIV.
Find the right allocation for FUSD.L and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer