PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FUSD.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FUSD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSD.L returned 11.75%/yr vs 24.18%/yr for IUIT.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FUSD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.

Performance

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSD.L achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 23.04% return.

FUSD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.07%
YTD
7.97%
6M
8.45%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
—

IUIT.L

1D
-2.11%
1M
10.65%
YTD
23.04%
6M
22.40%
1Y
50.55%
3Y*
34.42%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*
26.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSD.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc		7.97%16.45%17.47%18.48%-10.54%26.22%11.82%31.47%-4.52%16.21%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF		23.04%22.93%38.51%59.45%-29.15%34.09%43.14%48.90%-1.41%24.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSD.L and IUIT.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017

0.79

The correlation between FUSD.L and IUIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FUSD.L
IUIT.L

Technology

35.0%
99.6%

Financial Services

12.6%

-

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Industrials

8.8%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Energy

3.5%
0.1%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Technology

FUSD.L
35.0%
IUIT.L
99.6%

Financial Services

FUSD.L
12.6%
IUIT.L

-

Communication Services

FUSD.L
10.6%
IUIT.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

FUSD.L
9.3%
IUIT.L

-

Healthcare

FUSD.L
9.1%
IUIT.L

-

Industrials

FUSD.L
8.8%
IUIT.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

FUSD.L
4.5%
IUIT.L

-

Energy

FUSD.L
3.5%
IUIT.L
0.1%

Utilities

FUSD.L
2.3%
IUIT.L

-

Basic Materials

FUSD.L
2.2%
IUIT.L

-

Real Estate

FUSD.L
2.1%
IUIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF

Often compared with FUSD.L:
FUSD.L vs. SCHDFUSD.L vs. VHYD.LFUSD.L vs. TDIV.ASFUSD.L vs. VUSA.ASFUSD.L vs. ISPA.DEFUSD.L vs. VDIV.DEFUSD.L vs. DGRP.L
Often compared with IUIT.L:
IUIT.L vs. VGTIUIT.L vs. QQQIUIT.L vs. QQQMIUIT.L vs. EQQQ.DEIUIT.L vs. VOOIUIT.L vs. VUAA.LIUIT.L vs. WITS.AS

Return for Risk

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FUSD.L
FUSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FUSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FUSD.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.30
2.55

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.55
3.36

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.03

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

8.99

+4.00

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSD.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FUSD.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.55

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.02

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.20

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.16

-0.30

Drawdowns

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.82%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSD.L and IUIT.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FUSD.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.82%

-33.46%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-17.03%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.61%

-26.40%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.41%

-33.46%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.46%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-3.14%

+2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-6.02%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

5.76%

-3.94%

Volatility

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) is 2.91%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that FUSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FUSD.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

7.49%

-4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

15.53%

-7.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.29%

20.28%

-9.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

23.61%

-9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

22.47%

-6.69%

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FUSD.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

FUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while IUIT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSD.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc		1.42%1.47%1.85%2.10%2.31%2.30%2.30%1.95%2.19%1.24%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FUSD.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUSD.L.

FUSD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSD.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSD.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer