PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUSA.L is traded in USD, while VHYL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VHYL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.L achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than VHYL.L's 11.52% return.


FUSA.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
6.22%
6M
6.01%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*

VHYL.L

1D
0.56%
1M
0.42%
YTD
11.52%
6M
11.84%
1Y
26.48%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
6.22%16.26%18.00%18.06%-10.51%26.22%12.02%31.29%-3.14%14.79%
VHYL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
11.52%27.15%9.37%10.81%-5.37%18.15%-0.58%21.69%-11.88%13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.L and VHYL.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.71

The correlation between FUSA.L and VHYL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUSA.L
VHYL.L

Technology

37.7%
7.7%

Financial Services

11.9%
28.6%

Communication Services

10.2%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
7.0%

Healthcare

9.0%
11.2%

Industrials

8.4%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
8.7%

Energy

3.2%
9.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
5.1%

Utilities

2.0%
5.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.9%

Technology

FUSA.L
37.7%
VHYL.L
7.7%

Financial Services

FUSA.L
11.9%
VHYL.L
28.6%

Communication Services

FUSA.L
10.2%
VHYL.L
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FUSA.L
9.1%
VHYL.L
7.0%

Healthcare

FUSA.L
9.0%
VHYL.L
11.2%

Industrials

FUSA.L
8.4%
VHYL.L
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

FUSA.L
4.4%
VHYL.L
8.7%

Energy

FUSA.L
3.2%
VHYL.L
9.4%

Basic Materials

FUSA.L
2.1%
VHYL.L
5.1%

Utilities

FUSA.L
2.0%
VHYL.L
5.7%

Real Estate

FUSA.L
2.0%
VHYL.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSA.L
FUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VHYL.L
VHYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUSA.LVHYL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.37

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.68

11.87

-1.19

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.L and VHYL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, roughly equal to the maximum VHYL.L drawdown of -36.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.L and VHYL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSA.LVHYL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-36.01%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-7.82%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-12.59%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

-21.60%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-1.19%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-5.31%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.23%

-0.33%

Volatility

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that FUSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSA.LVHYL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

2.73%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.08%

8.34%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

10.31%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

13.23%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

14.50%

+1.23%

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VHYL.L's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUSA.L vs. VHYL.L - Dividend Comparison

FUSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHYL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHYL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing
2.52%2.79%3.08%3.37%3.67%3.08%3.28%3.34%3.63%3.09%2.88%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSA.L and VHYL.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUSA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYL.L.

FUSA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while VHYL.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSA.L and 0.29% for VHYL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSA.L and VHYL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer