FUSA.L vs. USDV.L
FUSA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both exchange-traded funds - FUSA.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while USDV.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSA.L returned 11.35%/yr vs 6.74%/yr for USDV.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FUSA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.
Performance
FUSA.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FUSA.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUSA.L achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 9.74% return.
FUSA.L
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 15.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
FUSA.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 6.22% | 16.26% | 18.00% | 18.06% | -10.51% | 26.22% | 12.02% | 31.29% | -3.14% | 14.79% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 9.74% | 8.78% | 7.52% | 1.58% | -0.37% | 25.59% | 0.26% | 23.70% | -4.23% | 12.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUSA.L and USDV.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FUSA.L and USDV.L has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FUSA.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Financial Services
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Communication Services
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Healthcare
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Industrials
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Consumer Defensive
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Energy
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Basic Materials
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Utilities
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Real Estate
FUSA.L
USDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUSA.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
FUSA.L
USDV.L
FUSA.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUSA.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.26 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.68 | 5.57 | +5.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUSA.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.L and USDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUSA.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -38.11% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.13% | -6.96% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.92% | -15.12% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.37% | -15.12% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -1.25% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -6.61% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.84% | -0.94% |
Volatility
FUSA.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.48%. This indicates that FUSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUSA.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 2.48% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 6.87% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.79% | 9.68% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 13.82% | +0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 15.74% | -0.01% |
FUSA.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUSA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUSA.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison
FUSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUSA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.01% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.28% | 2.11% | 2.13% | 2.57% | 2.07% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUSA.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUSA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.
FUSA.L is categorized as Dividend, while USDV.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. FUSA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSA.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.
Find the right allocation for FUSA.L and USDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer