PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FUSA.L vs. UINC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FUSA.L vs. UINC.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

FUSA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) and UINC.L (First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF) are both Dividend funds - FUSA.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index while UINC.L tracks the First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSA.L returned 11.79%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for UINC.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

FUSA.L vs. UINC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF (UINC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUSA.L is traded in USD, while UINC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UINC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.L achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than UINC.L's 17.86% return.

FUSA.L

1D
0.37%
1M
0.99%
6M
9.19%
YTD
9.77%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
—

UINC.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.67%
6M
14.67%
YTD
17.86%
1Y
24.20%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.L vs. UINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc		9.77%16.26%18.00%18.06%-10.51%26.22%12.02%31.29%-3.14%14.79%
UINC.L
First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF		17.86%7.56%6.68%16.63%-6.91%33.71%0.21%17.10%-8.88%16.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.L and UINC.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FUSA.L and UINC.L has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc

First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF

Often compared with FUSA.L:
FUSA.L vs. SCHDFUSA.L vs. DGRA.LFUSA.L vs. VUAA.LFUSA.L vs. SPYFUSA.L vs. VUSA.ASFUSA.L vs. DGRWFUSA.L vs. EQQB.DE

Return for Risk

FUSA.L vs. UINC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FUSA.L
FUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
UINC.L
UINC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UINC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UINC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UINC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
UINC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UINC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.L vs. UINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF (UINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FUSA.LUINC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.92
2.06

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.96
3.13

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.69

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

10.25

+0.64

FUSA.L vs. UINC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the UINC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.L and UINC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUSA.L vs. UINC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum UINC.L drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.L and UINC.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FUSA.LUINC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-45.64%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-7.04%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-21.58%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

-21.58%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-45.00%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-10.56%

+6.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.54%

-0.64%

Volatility

FUSA.L vs. UINC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) is 2.59%, while First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF (UINC.L) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that FUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FUSA.LUINC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

3.18%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

8.85%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

12.74%

-1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

17.95%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

20.46%

-4.76%

Dividends

FUSA.L vs. UINC.L - Dividend Comparison

FUSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UINC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UINC.L
First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF		2.82%3.03%2.84%3.20%3.25%2.15%3.40%3.14%3.01%2.49%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

FUSA.L and UINC.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUSA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while UINC.L tracks First Trust US Equity Income UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSA.L and UINC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer