PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Ultra-Short Income Active ETF USD Acc (JPAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUSA.L is traded in USD, while JPAS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JPAS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.L achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than JPAS.L's 2.11% return.


FUSA.L

1D
0.37%
1M
0.99%
6M
9.19%
YTD
9.77%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*

JPAS.L

1D
0.52%
1M
0.76%
6M
2.06%
YTD
2.11%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
9.77%16.26%18.00%18.06%-10.51%26.22%12.02%14.49%
JPAS.L
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Ultra-Short Income Active ETF USD Acc
2.11%5.32%5.49%4.53%1.03%0.46%1.85%-21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.L and JPAS.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSA.L
FUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JPAS.L
JPAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JPAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Ultra-Short Income Active ETF USD Acc (JPAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUSA.LJPAS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.87

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

14.78

-3.89

FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the JPAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.L and JPAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, which is greater than JPAS.L's maximum drawdown of -24.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.L and JPAS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSA.LJPAS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-24.25%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-1.21%

-6.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-1.21%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

-2.53%

-16.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.22%

+4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-16.59%

+12.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.32%

+1.58%

Volatility

FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - USD Ultra-Short Income Active ETF USD Acc (JPAS.L) at 1.36%. This indicates that FUSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSA.LJPAS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

1.36%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

3.69%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

4.30%

+6.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

4.76%

+10.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

9.93%

+5.77%

FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than JPAS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FUSA.L vs. JPAS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUSA.L nor JPAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSA.L and JPAS.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPAS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPAS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUSA.L.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSA.L and 0.18% for JPAS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSA.L and JPAS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer