PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUSA.L is traded in USD, while IUKD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IUKD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.L achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than IUKD.L's 6.96% return.


FUSA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.04%
YTD
8.02%
6M
8.45%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*

IUKD.L

1D
0.54%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
6.96%
6M
11.25%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
6.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
8.02%16.31%17.98%18.04%-10.51%26.22%12.02%33.15%-7.83%
IUKD.L
iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF
6.96%42.09%10.40%11.39%-11.98%22.31%-15.41%23.62%-17.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.L and IUKD.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2018

0.57

The correlation between FUSA.L and IUKD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUSA.L
IUKD.L

Technology

35.0%

-

Financial Services

12.6%
41.6%

Communication Services

10.6%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
4.3%

Healthcare

9.1%
2.5%

Industrials

8.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
15.0%

Energy

3.5%
10.0%

Utilities

2.3%
7.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.1%
7.8%

Technology

FUSA.L
35.0%
IUKD.L

-

Financial Services

FUSA.L
12.6%
IUKD.L
41.6%

Communication Services

FUSA.L
10.6%
IUKD.L
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FUSA.L
9.3%
IUKD.L
4.3%

Healthcare

FUSA.L
9.1%
IUKD.L
2.5%

Industrials

FUSA.L
8.8%
IUKD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

FUSA.L
4.5%
IUKD.L
15.0%

Energy

FUSA.L
3.5%
IUKD.L
10.0%

Utilities

FUSA.L
2.3%
IUKD.L
7.8%

Basic Materials

FUSA.L
2.2%
IUKD.L
4.8%

Real Estate

FUSA.L
2.1%
IUKD.L
7.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSA.L
FUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IUKD.L
IUKD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IUKD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUKD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUKD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUKD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUKD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUSA.LIUKD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.31

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.13

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

7.26

+5.40

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the IUKD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.L and IUKD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUSA.LIUKD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.69

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.60

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.07

+0.76

Drawdowns

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum IUKD.L drawdown of -73.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.L and IUKD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSA.LIUKD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-73.23%

+37.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-10.99%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-12.78%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

-34.46%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-4.14%

+3.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-29.61%

+25.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

3.23%

-1.36%

Volatility

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) is 2.90%, while iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF (IUKD.L) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that FUSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUKD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSA.LIUKD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

4.77%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

11.09%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.55%

13.88%

-3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

17.82%

-3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

21.21%

-3.92%

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IUKD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUSA.L vs. IUKD.L - Dividend Comparison

FUSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUKD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUKD.L
iShares UK Dividend UCITS ETF
4.53%4.85%5.78%5.34%6.39%5.68%4.11%5.70%6.86%5.19%4.87%5.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSA.L and IUKD.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUSA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IUKD.L.

FUSA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while IUKD.L tracks FTSE UK Dividend+ Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSA.L and 0.40% for IUKD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSA.L and IUKD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer