PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSA.L vs. FGBL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSA.L vs. FGBL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (FGBL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUSA.L is traded in USD, while FGBL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGBL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.L achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly lower than FGBL.L's 13.78% return.


FUSA.L

1D
0.37%
1M
0.99%
6M
9.19%
YTD
9.77%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*

FGBL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.86%
6M
11.52%
YTD
13.78%
1Y
30.32%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.L vs. FGBL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
9.77%16.26%18.00%18.06%-10.51%26.22%12.02%31.29%-3.14%14.79%
FGBL.L
First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD
13.78%40.36%4.45%17.02%-7.46%9.79%-6.04%15.46%-11.25%15.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.L and FGBL.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.61

The correlation between FUSA.L and FGBL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSA.L vs. FGBL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSA.L
FUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FGBL.L
FGBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.L vs. FGBL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (FGBL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUSA.LFGBL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.49

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

4.07

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

14.20

-3.31

FUSA.L vs. FGBL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the FGBL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.L and FGBL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUSA.L vs. FGBL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum FGBL.L drawdown of -45.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.L and FGBL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSA.LFGBL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.84%

-45.40%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-7.55%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-13.56%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

-26.59%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-16.26%

+12.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.17%

-0.27%

Volatility

FUSA.L vs. FGBL.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD (FGBL.L) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSA.LFGBL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.65%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.19%

8.75%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

11.14%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

14.68%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

15.64%

+0.06%

Dividends

FUSA.L vs. FGBL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUSA.L nor FGBL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSA.L and FGBL.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUSA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while FGBL.L tracks First Trust Global Equity Income UCITS ETF Class A USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSA.L and FGBL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer