PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.DE achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV.AS's 9.89% return.


FUSA.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.18%
YTD
8.98%
6M
8.57%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*

TDIV.AS

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
9.89%
6M
12.76%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSA.DE
Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc
8.98%3.93%24.26%14.29%-5.73%37.53%1.62%35.26%-0.02%3.04%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
9.89%24.40%15.98%10.91%16.18%27.85%-10.17%20.97%-7.12%-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.DE and TDIV.AS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FUSA.DE and TDIV.AS has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSA.DE
FUSA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV.AS
TDIV.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUSA.DETDIV.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.51

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

7.19

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.57

19.93

-4.36

FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the TDIV.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.DE and TDIV.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUSA.DETDIV.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.79

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

1.43

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.84

-0.04

Drawdowns

FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.37%, roughly equal to the maximum TDIV.AS drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.DE and TDIV.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSA.DETDIV.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.37%

-36.06%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.24%

-3.51%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.86%

-15.26%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-15.26%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.99%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-3.93%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.26%

+0.12%

Volatility

FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) have volatilities of 2.49% and 2.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSA.DETDIV.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.38%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

6.65%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

9.06%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

12.07%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

14.31%

+1.34%

FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV.AS's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUSA.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Dividend Comparison

FUSA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FUSA.DE
Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDIV.AS
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.19%3.58%4.19%4.98%4.55%3.98%4.12%4.40%4.93%3.95%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSA.DE and TDIV.AS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUSA.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUSA.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

FUSA.DE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TDIV.AS is Global Equity Income. FUSA.DE tracks Fidelity US Quality Income NR USD, while TDIV.AS tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FUSA.DE and 0.38% for TDIV.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSA.DE and TDIV.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer