PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUNL vs. RAVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUNL vs. RAVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUNL achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly higher than RAVI's 1.53% return.


FUNL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.66%
6M
7.22%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*

RAVI

1D
0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.53%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUNL vs. RAVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FUNL
CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL
5.66%14.62%15.55%14.33%-5.76%25.93%14.92%
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF
1.53%4.98%5.67%5.55%0.15%-0.04%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FUNL and RAVI is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2020

0.08

The correlation between FUNL and RAVI shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUNL vs. RAVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNL
FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

RAVI
RAVI Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
RAVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAVI Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
RAVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAVI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUNL vs. RAVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUNLRAVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-8.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-20.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

5.39

-3.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

38.66

-33.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.31

225.58

-202.27

FUNL vs. RAVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUNL Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the RAVI Sharpe Ratio of 11.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUNL and RAVI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUNLRAVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

11.02

-8.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

2.49

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

2.03

-1.08

Drawdowns

FUNL vs. RAVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUNL drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than RAVI's maximum drawdown of -3.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNL and RAVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNLRAVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-3.72%

-15.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.83%

-0.12%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-0.36%

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-3.28%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-0.17%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

0.02%

+0.80%

Volatility

FUNL vs. RAVI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) is 0.00%, while FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF (RAVI) has a volatility of 0.15%. This indicates that FUNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RAVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUNLRAVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

0.15%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

0.30%

+4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

0.41%

+8.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

1.41%

+13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

1.28%

+14.01%

FUNL vs. RAVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUNL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RAVI's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUNL vs. RAVI - Dividend Comparison

FUNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than RAVI's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FUNL
CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL
2.25%2.10%1.78%1.69%1.84%1.55%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF
4.38%4.59%5.34%4.55%1.70%0.90%1.29%2.53%2.22%1.28%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUNL and RAVI have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RAVI has higher volatility (0.15%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUNL dropped -19.35% vs RAVI's -3.72%.

On 5-year performance, FUNL leads with 9.42% vs 3.50% for RAVI. On fees, RAVI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FUNL has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 3.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RAVI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FUNL.

RAVI has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.25% for FUNL.

FUNL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RAVI is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: CornerCap and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FUNL and 0.25% for RAVI.

RAVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.02 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUNL and RAVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer