PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUNFX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUNFX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3 (FUNFX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUNFX achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return.


FUNFX

1D
0.01%
1M
5.92%
YTD
15.28%
6M
16.32%
1Y
34.95%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*

RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUNFX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUNFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3
15.28%24.57%23.13%26.25%-16.38%22.81%15.28%27.47%-7.87%19.59%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%20.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FUNFX and RESGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between FUNFX and RESGX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUNFX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNFX
FUNFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FUNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUNFX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3 (FUNFX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUNFXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.56

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

5.89

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.68

21.39

-5.71

FUNFX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUNFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUNFX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUNFXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

3.21

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.61

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.72

+0.12

Drawdowns

FUNFX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUNFX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum RESGX drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNFX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNFXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-37.80%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-7.84%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-20.50%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.88%

-23.58%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-5.00%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.15%

+0.14%

Volatility

FUNFX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3 (FUNFX) is 3.68%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that FUNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUNFXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

5.45%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

11.00%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

14.41%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

17.26%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

18.71%

-0.60%

FUNFX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUNFX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUNFX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

FUNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, more than RESGX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FUNFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3
7.69%8.83%9.21%6.10%5.33%11.29%2.90%7.21%9.65%7.57%0.00%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUNFX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FUNFX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUNFX dropped -33.92% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUNFX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer