PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUNFX vs. JLGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUNFX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3 (FUNFX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUNFX achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's -1.77% return.


FUNFX

1D
2.12%
1M
-0.96%
6M
8.14%
YTD
12.31%
1Y
25.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.50%

JLGMX

1D
3.89%
1M
-4.42%
6M
-0.57%
YTD
-1.77%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
18.67%
ALL TIME*
16.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FUNFX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUNFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3
12.31%24.57%23.13%26.25%-16.38%22.81%15.28%27.47%-7.87%19.59%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
-1.77%14.38%35.40%34.95%-25.20%18.48%56.39%39.47%0.74%31.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FUNFX and JLGMX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.89

The correlation between FUNFX and JLGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUNFX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FUNFX
FUNFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FUNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

JLGMX
JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FUNFX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3 (FUNFX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUNFXJLGMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.05

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.20

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

0.54

+8.67

FUNFX vs. JLGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUNFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUNFX and JLGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUNFX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUNFX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNFX and JLGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNFXJLGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-31.82%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-16.73%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-21.47%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.88%

-31.13%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-9.01%

+6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-5.80%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

6.21%

-3.76%

Volatility

FUNFX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3 (FUNFX) is 4.21%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that FUNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUNFXJLGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

8.32%

-4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

15.28%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

18.99%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

20.74%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

21.80%

-3.69%

FUNFX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUNFX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUNFX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

FUNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, less than JLGMX's 11.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUNFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3
7.72%8.83%9.21%6.10%5.33%11.29%2.90%7.21%9.65%7.57%0.00%0.00%
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
11.24%11.04%2.12%0.31%3.49%14.25%5.14%12.65%15.59%14.44%9.71%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUNFX and JLGMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLGMX has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to FUNFX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUNFX dropped -33.92% vs JLGMX's -31.82%.

FUNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUNFX and JLGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer