PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUNFX vs. RCKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUNFX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3 (FUNFX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUNFX achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than RCKSX's 14.10% return.


FUNFX

1D
0.01%
1M
5.92%
YTD
15.28%
6M
16.32%
1Y
34.95%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*

RCKSX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.87%
YTD
14.10%
6M
14.42%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUNFX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUNFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3
15.28%24.57%23.13%26.25%-16.38%22.81%15.28%27.47%-7.87%19.59%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
14.10%12.99%15.12%15.57%-18.09%9.96%13.75%19.05%-2.14%17.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FUNFX and RCKSX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FUNFX and RCKSX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUNFX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNFX
FUNFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FUNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RCKSX
RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUNFX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3 (FUNFX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUNFXRCKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

5.11

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.68

14.18

+1.50

FUNFX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUNFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUNFX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUNFXRCKSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.83

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.48

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.38

+0.46

Drawdowns

FUNFX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUNFX drawdown since its inception was -33.92%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNFX and RCKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNFXRCKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-57.88%

+23.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-4.14%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-18.22%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.88%

-22.54%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-9.51%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.49%

+0.80%

Volatility

FUNFX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3 (FUNFX) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FUNFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUNFXRCKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

2.94%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

8.06%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

11.56%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

15.66%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

17.55%

+0.56%

FUNFX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUNFX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUNFX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

FUNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, more than RCKSX's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUNFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-3
7.69%8.83%9.21%6.10%5.33%11.29%2.90%7.21%9.65%7.57%0.00%0.00%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
5.48%6.26%0.47%0.71%1.00%4.31%16.56%3.18%0.59%5.91%0.70%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUNFX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUNFX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to RCKSX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUNFX dropped -33.92% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

FUNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUNFX and RCKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer