FUMBX vs. GUSTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX).
FUMBX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2005. GUSTX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Mar 16, 2009.
Performance
FUMBX vs. GUSTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FUMBX vs. GUSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.16% | 5.83% | 3.25% | 4.47% | -5.84% | -1.38% | 4.22% | 4.19% | 1.47% | -0.33% |
GUSTX GMO U.S. Treasury Fund | 0.51% | 4.45% | 2.21% | 2.52% | -0.73% | -0.06% | 0.89% | 0.14% | -79.59% | 0.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUMBX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than GUSTX's 0.51% return.
FUMBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
GUSTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 3.69%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- -13.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FUMBX vs. GUSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUMBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than GUSTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FUMBX vs. GUSTX — Risk / Return Rank
FUMBX
GUSTX
FUMBX vs. GUSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) and GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUMBX | GUSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 3.18 | -1.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 10.74 | -8.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 7.08 | -5.73 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 20.50 | -18.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 57.63 | -49.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUMBX | GUSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 3.18 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.03 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | -0.44 | +1.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FUMBX and GUSTX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FUMBX vs. GUSTX - Dividend Comparison
FUMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than GUSTX's 3.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.67% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 1.64% | 0.86% | 1.15% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUSTX GMO U.S. Treasury Fund | 3.62% | 4.15% | 1.98% | 2.28% | 0.26% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 8.96% | 0.50% | 0.05% | 0.04% |
Drawdowns
FUMBX vs. GUSTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.83%, smaller than the maximum GUSTX drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMBX and GUSTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUMBX | GUSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -79.98% | +71.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.54% | -0.20% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.60% | -1.19% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -77.89% | +77.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -35.62% | +33.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.07% | +0.37% |
Volatility
FUMBX vs. GUSTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX) at 0.29%. This indicates that FUMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FUMBX | GUSTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 0.29% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.39% | 0.83% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32% | 1.21% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 1.73% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.49% | 25.44% | -22.95% |