PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUMB vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUMB vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUMB achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return.


FUMB

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.15%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.30%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUMB vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FUMB
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
1.07%2.78%3.05%2.84%-0.03%0.38%1.25%1.76%0.30%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FUMB and YCS is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018

-0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUMB vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUMB
FUMB Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FUMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUMB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FUMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUMB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUMB vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUMBYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.35

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.70

3.97

+7.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.37

12.40

+31.97

FUMB vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUMB Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUMB and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUMBYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.38

1.92

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.70

1.12

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.33

+0.67

Drawdowns

FUMB vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUMB drawdown since its inception was -2.68%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUMB and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUMBYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-49.56%

+46.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.22%

-8.30%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.60%

-23.05%

+22.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.25%

-27.32%

+26.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-19.93%

+19.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

2.66%

-2.60%

Volatility

FUMB vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB) is 0.20%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that FUMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUMBYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

2.75%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.53%

12.32%

-11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76%

17.27%

-16.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.16%

21.10%

-19.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.77%

19.01%

-17.24%

FUMB vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUMB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUMB vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

FUMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FUMB
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF
2.80%2.90%2.86%2.24%1.02%0.43%0.94%1.74%0.15%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUMB and YCS have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FUMB (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUMB dropped -2.68% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.54% vs 1.96% for FUMB. On fees, FUMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FUMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.54% return vs 1.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

FUMB has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

FUMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FUMB and 1.00% for YCS.

FUMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUMB and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer