FULVX vs. QIACX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FULVX (Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund) and QIACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FULVX returned 5.24%/yr vs 15.65%/yr for QIACX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FULVX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QIACX.

Performance

FULVX vs. QIACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FULVX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than QIACX's 6.94% return.

FULVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.85%
• YTD: -0.01%
• 6M: -0.47%
• 1Y: 1.05%
• 3Y*: 9.47%
• 5Y*: 5.24%
• 10Y*: —

QIACX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 6.94%
• 6M: 8.29%
• 1Y: 22.39%
• 3Y*: 24.89%
• 5Y*: 15.65%
• 10Y*: 16.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FULVX vs. QIACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FULVX Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund	-0.01%	5.23%	17.76%	6.38%	-10.43%	17.79%	3.83%	4.30%
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	6.94%	21.15%	31.07%	23.52%	-14.16%	31.40%	21.95%	5.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FULVX and QIACX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2019	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FULVX and QIACX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FULVX vs. QIACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FULVX

FULVX Risk / Return Rank: 3
FULVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FULVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FULVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FULVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FULVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QIACX

QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 52
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FULVX vs. QIACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FULVX	QIACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	1.95	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	2.85	-2.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.41	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.00	2.71	-2.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.00	12.68	-12.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FULVX vs. QIACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FULVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the QIACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FULVX and QIACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FULVX	QIACX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00	1.95	-1.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.90	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.57	-0.17

Drawdowns

FULVX vs. QIACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FULVX drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum QIACX drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FULVX and QIACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FULVX	QIACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.24%	-60.11%	+26.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.33%	-8.65%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.31%	-19.41%	+9.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.64%	-23.05%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.95%	-1.01%	-2.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-9.29%	+4.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.84%	+0.32%

Volatility

FULVX vs. QIACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX) is 1.84%, while Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that FULVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FULVX	QIACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.84%	2.73%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.81%	9.46%	-3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.38%	12.01%	-3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.19%	17.38%	-5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.22%	18.70%	-2.48%

FULVX vs. QIACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FULVX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than QIACX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FULVX vs. QIACX - Dividend Comparison

FULVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.25%, more than QIACX's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FULVX Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund	13.25%	6.82%	5.76%	1.65%	4.98%	5.35%	0.62%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	4.28%	4.58%	8.65%	1.40%	10.90%	17.44%	3.01%	3.34%	8.60%	0.69%	1.12%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FULVX and QIACX in my portfolio?

FULVX and QIACX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FULVX or QIACX?

QIACX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to FULVX (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FULVX dropped -33.24% vs QIACX's -60.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QIACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.