PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUL vs. UVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUL vs. UVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Universal Corporation (UVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than UVV's 3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FUL has underperformed UVV with an annualized return of 3.54%, while UVV has yielded a comparatively higher 5.09% annualized return.


FUL

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
1.73%
6M
4.84%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
-1.57%
5Y*
-1.62%
10Y*
3.54%

UVV

1D
-1.88%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
3.14%
6M
4.14%
1Y
-7.53%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
5.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUL vs. UVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
1.73%-10.46%-16.19%14.97%-10.59%57.84%2.15%22.42%-19.84%12.79%
UVV
Universal Corporation
3.14%2.27%-13.39%35.79%1.82%19.59%-8.96%11.08%7.79%-14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FUL and UVV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.32

Fundamentals

EPS

FUL:

$2.88

UVV:

$1.73

PE Ratio

FUL:

20.81

UVV:

30.51

PS Ratio

FUL:

0.96

UVV:

0.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUL:

$3.46B

UVV:

$2.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUL:

$1.11B

UVV:

$412.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

FUL:

$495.48M

UVV:

$212.91M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUL vs. UVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUL
FUL Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUL Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUL Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

UVV
UVV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUL vs. UVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Universal Corporation (UVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FULUVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.96

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

-0.50

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.98

-0.83

+1.82

FUL vs. UVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUL Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the UVV Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUL and UVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FULUVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

-0.32

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.19

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.18

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.28

-0.01

Drawdowns

FUL vs. UVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, roughly equal to the maximum UVV drawdown of -69.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and UVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FULUVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.25%

-69.75%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.97%

-15.23%

-11.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.45%

-29.70%

-13.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.45%

-29.70%

-13.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.29%

-45.68%

-10.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.49%

-14.30%

-14.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-18.59%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.70%

9.04%

-0.34%

Volatility

FUL vs. UVV - Volatility Comparison

H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to Universal Corporation (UVV) at 10.11%. This indicates that FUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FULUVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.03%

10.11%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.42%

18.46%

+7.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.82%

23.77%

+11.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.38%

24.57%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.11%

28.94%

+2.17%

Dividends

FUL vs. UVV - Dividend Comparison

FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than UVV's 6.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
1.58%1.56%1.29%0.99%1.03%0.82%1.25%1.23%1.44%1.10%1.14%1.40%
UVV
Universal Corporation
6.22%6.18%5.87%4.72%5.95%5.64%6.30%5.29%4.80%4.11%3.33%3.71%

Financials

FUL vs. UVV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and Universal Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
770.84M
0
(FUL) Total Revenue
(UVV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FUL and UVV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUL has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to UVV (10.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs UVV's -69.75%.

FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUL and UVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer