FUL vs. SCS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) and SCS (Steelcase Inc.) are both stocks. FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while SCS operates in Business Equipment & Supplies (Industrials). At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FUL vs. SCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Steelcase Inc. (SCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FUL

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 4.44%
• YTD: 6.10%
• 6M: 7.99%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: -0.96%
• 5Y*: -0.76%
• 10Y*: 4.32%

SCS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUL vs. SCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FUL H.B. Fuller Company	6.10%	-10.46%	-16.19%	14.97%	-10.59%	57.84%	2.15%	22.42%	-19.84%	12.79%
SCS Steelcase Inc.	0.00%	39.89%	-9.11%	97.75%	-36.31%	-9.87%	-31.43%	42.60%	1.19%	-12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FUL and SCS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 1998	0.41

The correlation between FUL and SCS shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap FUL : $3.48B SCS : $1.93B
EPS FUL : $2.88 SCS : $0.80
PE Ratio FUL : 21.71 SCS : 20.20
PS Ratio FUL : 1.00 SCS : 0.59
PB Ratio FUL : 1.68 SCS : 1.89
Total Revenue (TTM) FUL : $3.46B SCS : $3.26B
Gross Profit (TTM) FUL : $1.11B SCS : $1.09B
EBITDA (TTM) FUL : $495.48M SCS : $208.30M

Return for Risk

FUL vs. SCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUL

FUL Risk / Return Rank: 53
FUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
FUL Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FUL Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUL vs. SCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Steelcase Inc. (SCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FUL	SCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FUL	SCS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FUL	SCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.42%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.76%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.61%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FUL	SCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.73%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.37%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.10%	—	—

Dividends

FUL vs. SCS - Dividend Comparison

FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than SCS's 1.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FUL H.B. Fuller Company	1.52%	1.56%	1.29%	0.99%	1.03%	0.82%	1.25%	1.23%	1.44%	1.10%	1.14%	1.40%
SCS Steelcase Inc.	1.24%	1.86%	4.23%	2.22%	6.93%	4.56%	2.73%	2.83%	3.64%	3.36%	3.31%	2.27%

Financials

FUL vs. SCS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between H.B. Fuller Company and Steelcase Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FUL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 240.99M and revenue of 770.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

SCS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported a gross profit of 312.10M and revenue of 897.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.

FUL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 60.86M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

SCS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported an operating income of 53.10M and revenue of 897.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

FUL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 21.05M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

SCS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Steelcase Inc. reported a net income of 35.00M and revenue of 897.10M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUL and SCS in my portfolio?

FUL and SCS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.