FUL vs. LOW
FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) and LOW (Lowe's Companies, Inc.) are both stocks. FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while LOW operates in Home Improvement Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FUL returned 3.54%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for LOW. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUL vs. LOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than LOW's -12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FUL has underperformed LOW with an annualized return of 3.54%, while LOW has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.
FUL
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- 8.55%
- 3Y*
- -1.57%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
LOW
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -14.26%
- 1Y
- -5.86%
- 3Y*
- 1.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
FUL vs. LOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.73% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | -12.96% | -0.33% | 13.01% | 14.03% | -21.49% | 63.34% | 36.40% | 32.23% | 1.22% | 33.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUL and LOW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, FUL and LOW have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FUL:
$3.33B
LOW:
$116.46B
FUL:
$2.88
LOW:
$11.86
FUL:
20.81
LOW:
17.54
FUL:
0.96
LOW:
1.32
FUL:
$3.46B
LOW:
$88.43B
FUL:
$1.11B
LOW:
$29.89B
FUL:
$495.48M
LOW:
$11.50B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUL vs. LOW — Risk / Return Rank
FUL
LOW
FUL vs. LOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUL | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.98 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | -0.21 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | -0.49 | +1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUL | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | -0.23 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.14 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.42 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.46 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
FUL vs. LOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, which is greater than LOW's maximum drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and LOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUL | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.25% | -62.52% | -5.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -27.75% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.45% | -27.75% | -15.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.45% | -33.86% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.29% | -48.63% | -7.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.49% | -27.29% | -1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -16.60% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.70% | 11.96% | -3.26% |
Volatility
FUL vs. LOW - Volatility Comparison
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) at 6.36%. This indicates that FUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUL | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 6.36% | +4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.42% | 19.88% | +6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.82% | 25.77% | +9.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.38% | 26.15% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 29.14% | +1.97% |
Dividends
FUL vs. LOW - Dividend Comparison
FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than LOW's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | 2.31% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.93% | 1.86% | 1.08% | 1.40% | 1.72% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.77% | 1.34% |
Financials
FUL vs. LOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and Lowe's Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FUL vs. LOW - Profitability Comparison
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 240.99M and revenue of 770.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
LOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.54B and revenue of 23.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 60.86M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
LOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.55B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 21.05M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
LOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.63B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUL and LOW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUL has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to LOW (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs LOW's -62.52%.
FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUL and LOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer