FUL vs. KO
FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) and KO (The Coca-Cola Company) are both stocks. FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while KO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, FUL returned 3.34%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for KO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUL vs. KO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a -5.25% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FUL has underperformed KO with an annualized return of 3.34%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return.
FUL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -12.09%
- 6M
- -13.96%
- YTD
- -5.25%
- 1Y
- -10.17%
- 3Y*
- -5.92%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
KO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 19.99%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 22.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
FUL vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | -5.25% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 21.02% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUL and KO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.24 |
The correlation between FUL and KO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FUL:
$3.01B
KO:
$359.21B
FUL:
$3.36
KO:
$3.18
FUL:
16.65
KO:
26.29
FUL:
0.88
KO:
7.31
FUL:
1.48
KO:
10.71
FUL:
$3.51B
KO:
$49.28B
FUL:
$1.14B
KO:
$30.43B
FUL:
$511.88M
KO:
$18.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUL vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank
FUL
KO
FUL vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUL | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.24 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 2.94 | -3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 6.43 | -7.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUL vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, roughly equal to the maximum KO drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and KO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUL | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.25% | -68.23% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -7.87% | -19.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.45% | -16.26% | -27.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.45% | -17.27% | -26.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.29% | -36.99% | -19.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.40% | -0.77% | -32.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.78% | -16.07% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.16% | 3.59% | +5.57% |
Volatility
FUL vs. KO - Volatility Comparison
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 6.59%. This indicates that FUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUL | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.36% | 6.59% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.21% | 13.54% | +14.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.74% | 17.27% | +16.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 16.32% | +13.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.17% | 18.29% | +12.88% |
Dividends
FUL vs. KO - Dividend Comparison
FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than KO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.70% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.49% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
FUL vs. KO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FUL vs. KO - Profitability Comparison
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 322.24M and revenue of 950.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 122.83M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 67.81M and revenue of 950.27M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUL and KO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUL has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to KO (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs KO's -68.23%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUL and KO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer