PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUL vs. DOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUL vs. DOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Dover Corporation (DOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than DOV's 11.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FUL has underperformed DOV with an annualized return of 4.39%, while DOV has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return.


FUL

1D
0.05%
1M
7.21%
YTD
7.83%
6M
6.17%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
0.07%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
4.39%

DOV

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.56%
YTD
11.89%
6M
9.71%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
16.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUL vs. DOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
7.83%-10.46%-16.19%14.97%-10.59%57.84%2.15%22.42%-19.84%12.79%
DOV
Dover Corporation
11.89%5.24%23.35%15.22%-24.34%45.73%11.53%65.80%-11.11%37.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FUL and DOV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.42

The correlation between FUL and DOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUL:

$3.53B

DOV:

$29.55B

EPS

FUL:

$2.88

DOV:

$8.01

PE Ratio

FUL:

22.06

DOV:

27.14

PS Ratio

FUL:

1.02

DOV:

3.61

PB Ratio

FUL:

1.71

DOV:

3.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUL:

$3.46B

DOV:

$8.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUL:

$1.11B

DOV:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

FUL:

$495.48M

DOV:

$1.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUL vs. DOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUL
FUL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DOV
DOV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUL vs. DOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and Dover Corporation (DOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FULDOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.18

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

1.50

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.77

3.42

-1.66

FUL vs. DOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUL Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the DOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUL and DOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUL vs. DOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, which is greater than DOV's maximum drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and DOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FULDOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.25%

-58.22%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.97%

-15.34%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.45%

-26.59%

-16.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.45%

-35.56%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.29%

-45.24%

-11.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.20%

-6.36%

-17.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-13.14%

-5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.68%

6.71%

+1.97%

Volatility

FUL vs. DOV - Volatility Comparison

H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to Dover Corporation (DOV) at 7.17%. This indicates that FUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FULDOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.90%

7.17%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.69%

18.33%

+8.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.83%

24.36%

+10.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.46%

24.87%

+4.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.13%

26.75%

+4.38%

Dividends

FUL vs. DOV - Dividend Comparison

FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than DOV's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOV
Dover Corporation
0.96%1.06%1.09%1.32%1.48%1.10%1.56%1.68%2.55%1.80%2.30%2.67%
FUL
H.B. Fuller Company
1.49%1.56%1.29%0.99%1.03%0.82%1.25%1.23%1.44%1.10%1.14%1.40%

Financials

FUL vs. DOV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and Dover Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
770.84M
2.05B
(FUL) Total Revenue
(DOV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FUL vs. DOV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between H.B. Fuller Company and Dover Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
31.3%
38.9%
Portfolio components
FUL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 240.99M and revenue of 770.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

DOV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dover Corporation reported a gross profit of 798.14M and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

FUL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 60.86M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

DOV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dover Corporation reported an operating income of 305.91M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

FUL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 21.05M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

DOV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dover Corporation reported a net income of 238.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FUL and DOV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUL has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to DOV (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs DOV's -58.22%.

DOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUL and DOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer