FTZIX vs. LZEMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FTZIX (Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund) and LZEMX (Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - FTZIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fuller & Thaler Asset Mgmt, while LZEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 5 years, FTZIX returned 15.07%/yr vs 13.67%/yr for LZEMX. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTZIX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for LZEMX.

Performance

FTZIX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTZIX achieves a 21.01% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 25.35% return.

FTZIX

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 7.47%
• YTD: 21.01%
• 6M: 18.71%
• 1Y: 46.67%
• 3Y*: 27.37%
• 5Y*: 15.07%
• 10Y*: —

LZEMX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 25.35%
• 6M: 27.30%
• 1Y: 52.07%
• 3Y*: 26.40%
• 5Y*: 13.67%
• 10Y*: 10.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTZIX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FTZIX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund	21.01%	22.63%	25.31%	27.18%	-21.31%	25.25%	19.60%	33.70%	0.00%
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	25.35%	41.35%	7.60%	22.44%	-14.86%	5.37%	-0.07%	18.06%	0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FTZIX and LZEMX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018	0.61

The correlation between FTZIX and LZEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTZIX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTZIX

FTZIX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FTZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FTZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FTZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FTZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FTZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

LZEMX

LZEMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
LZEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
LZEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
LZEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
LZEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
LZEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTZIX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTZIX	LZEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	3.66	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	4.68	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.67	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.16	4.94	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.94	17.74	+2.21

FTZIX vs. LZEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTZIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the LZEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTZIX and LZEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTZIX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTZIX drawdown since its inception was -37.22%, smaller than the maximum LZEMX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTZIX and LZEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTZIX	LZEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.22%	-60.08%	+22.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-10.42%	+1.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.65%	-14.27%	-4.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.53%	-29.29%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-1.27%	+0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.47%	-16.61%	+10.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	2.90%	-0.57%

Volatility

FTZIX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) is 5.25%, while Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that FTZIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTZIX	LZEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	5.54%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.36%	11.84%	+1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.72%	14.08%	+2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.52%	14.44%	+5.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.33%	16.42%	+5.91%

FTZIX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTZIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTZIX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison

FTZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than LZEMX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTZIX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund	0.04%	0.05%	0.11%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio	1.63%	2.05%	3.11%	3.76%	5.92%	4.89%	2.11%	2.45%	2.10%	1.99%	1.48%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTZIX and LZEMX in my portfolio?

FTZIX and LZEMX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTZIX or LZEMX?

LZEMX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to FTZIX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTZIX dropped -37.22% vs LZEMX's -60.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LZEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.